|
The Informatics Review > Thoughts - Using E-mail in Clinical Care |
So you're thinking of beginning to use e-mail in your practice? Did you decide on your own or are your patients or colleagues goading you into it? You're not alone. A 1999 survey conducted by Healtheon/WebMD showed that although only 3% of physicians surveyed were regularly e-mailing their patients, another 9% described their use of e-mail as growing and an additional 22% had done so at some point. These numbers had all grown substantially from the prior year's survey.
So what should you think about as you enter this brave new world of electronic patient centered communication? What are some strategies you should employ so this technology improves your efficiency and satisfaction rather than detracts from it?
First, let's dispel some myths:
It is true that, in general, people tend to use unencrypted e-mail, and that e-mail is transmitted from computer to computer across an open network. It is also true that it is possible to intercept these messages. However give the incredible volume of e-mail (hundreds of millions per year) it is extremely unlikely that a given e-mail will be intercepted. More common are:
In addition, messages that are misaddressed (or sent to inactive e-mail addresses) may be intercepted and possibly read by system administrators for troubleshooting. Also, the courts have upheld an employer's right to read e-mail messages that are sent on an employer-owned e-mail system.
All this means that, at worse, e-mail is as secure as sending a postcard. In practice it is much safer than that when used appropriately.
The time you use answering e-mail messages from patients will be offset by time you won't spend on the phone with them. At least with e-mail, messages are more concise, they can be answered anytime of day or night, and patients won't forget what you tell them. You may want to set up a system of e-mail triage, where all messages from patients initially get sent to a triage nurse who involves you as needed.
We aren't reimbursed for time spent on the telephone, either. If you have a large population of capitated patients, any time you spend communicating with your patients to prevent unnecessary utilization of health care services is time well spent.
This has not been the experience of those who have tried it. In general, patients respect your time and will not contact you constantly. Physicians who give out their page numbers to patients often find this to be the case. I have heard from physicians who give their e-mail address to patients with multiple somatic complaints and have found symptom reduction over time with regular e-mail exchanges!
Again, this has not been the experience of those who adopt this communication medium in their practices. Unlike talking, either in person or over the telephone, typing offers a certain barrier to rambling. In addition, it is important to explain to patients ahead of time that their messages should be concise. When they are not, you can let them know that the long discussions are better suited to other means of communication or a face-to-face discussion.
You are likely to be named in a malpractice suit whether or not you use e-mail. Because e-mail exchanges, when stored and filed in the patient's record, provide a self-documenting paper trail, they are more likely to come to your defense in a malpractice suit. Contrast this with the poor documentation that usually accompanies telephone transactions.
If you would like to use e-mail, how should you go about it? Here are some tips that I have used and shared with many physicians.
Forms of computer-based communication are likely to be important to your patients and to your practice within the next few years. E-mail is one way of doing this, as we've discussed. Another is using a system of secure web-pages to communicate with your patients. These systems are available for little or no money and provide a nice way of managing your practice communications, including an integrated practice web page which can help promote your practice.
When used properly, you will find that electronic patient-centered communication will be satisfying for you, your office staff, and your patients.
For more information, I've set up a web site devoted to this subject at http://clinical.caregroup.org/ePCC/.
You can also see another provider's opinion at:
E-mail is just what the doctor ordered describing Eugenia Marcus, M.D., a kindly pediatrician, wise in the ways of primary care and exuberant about kids.
© 2000 Dean F. Sittig
|
The Informatics Review > Thoughts - Using E-mail in Clinical Care |