|
Informatics Review > Thoughts > Survey of Physicians’ Experience Using a Handheld Drug Reference Guide |
Survey
of Physicians’ Experience Using a Handheld Drug
Reference Guide
Jeffrey
M. Rothschild MD1, Thomas H. Lee MD2, Taran Bae MD2,
Rena Yamamoto2, Jan
Horsky MA1, David W. Bates MD1
1 Division
of General Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA;
2ePocrates,
Inc., San Carlos, CA
reprinted
from "Converging Information, Technology, and Health Care"
Proceedings of the 2000 AMIA Annual Symposium. J. Marc Overhage, MD, PhD, ed.
Recently,
point-of-care technology has become more practical with the advent of palmtop
computing and represents a practical solution to this dilemma. A readily
accessible and up-to-date drug reference guide may thus provide a valuable tool
in patient care. qRx (ePocrates,
Inc.) is a comprehensive drug information guide downloadable from the Internet
and designed for the Palm OS Platform. It contains information for more than
1500 drugs. The database is continually maintained and is capable of
automatically updating devices remotely via “HotSynching.
Methods. A 7-day online
pilot survey of ePocrates users was conducted during March 2000. Physicians who
have previously downloaded the qRx software were solicited for participation via
e-mail. Approximately
3000 users were contacted, with a response rate of 29% (n=870).
The survey addressed issues relating to 4 domains: product evaluation,
impact on physician practice and efficiency, impact on physician behavior for
information-seeking and decision-making,
and impact on patient care. A 5-point Likert scale was used except for questions
needing quantifiable responses.
Results.
The respondents were physicians (74%) and medical students (26%). Physician
characteristics are as follows: practice experience ranged from 0-40 years (mean
7.5 years, mode 3 years); 33 specialties were represented, with internal
medicine generalists (28%) and specialists (14%) and family medicine (17%) most
frequent. Practice settings included only
inpatient (23%), only outpatient (16%) and both settings (61%).
Product
evaluation addressed experience with a handheld device (68% more than 6 months),
experience with qRx (85% more than 2 months), frequency qRx used per day (60%
more than 2 accesses per day), and time needed to find information in qRx (90%-
less than a minute). Practice impact evaluation included time previously needed
to find similar information (55%- greater than a minute), proportion of
questions satisfactorily answered by qRx (more than ¾
of questions addressed - 88%), and overall efficiency improvement in
inpatient and outpatient practice (71% and 69%, respectively). Product influence
on users included direct contributions of qRx to improving drug-related
decisions (81%), increased drug knowledge (80%), and reducing use of other drug
references (92%). Finally, impact on patient care included the number of drug
decisions affected per week (46%- 3 or more), the qRx features most useful in
patient care (dosing, drug interactions and adverse reactions), reduction in
preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) (50 % -1 or more per week), and if
patients were better informed (83%- yes) and more satisfied with their care
(54%-yes).
Discussion.
Our survey found that physicians and medical students have been able to
successfully incorporate handheld devices into their patient care workflow. With
the use of a drug information database, clinicians have saved time, improved
knowledge for themselves and their patients, and possibly decreased preventable
ADEs. These data demonstrate the perceived value of handheld devices, which will
clearly grow further as wireless communication becomes more routine.
References.
1. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug
events. ADE Prevention study group. JAMA. 1995;274:35-43.
© 2001 American Medical Informatics Association
|
Informatics Review > Thoughts > Survey of Physicians’ Experience Using a Handheld Drug Reference Guide |
1/14/01 dfs